Michael Sperber writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <email@example.com> writes:
> > Michael Sperber writes:
> > > The question is how do you get it there? And in such a way that it's
> > > guaranteed to be there before it gets used.
> > I was thinking auto-autoloads. If the relevant package isn't there,
> > then you're gonna be hosed anyway.
> The problem is there's no direct control over the order in which
> auto-autoloads are loaded. (Or did I miss something.)
I didn't see anything that immediately looked order-dependent in
*autoloads*, it's more likely I missed something. Maybe this is
something we should revisit for 23.0.
XEmacs-Patches mailing list